ORDER OF REVIEWING THE ARTICLES IN THE JOURNAL "AGRARIAN SCIENCE"
Article received by the editorial board, are subject to mandatory review.
The review is carried out and the Editorial Board of the Editorial Board or the appropriate specialty experts in accordance with the requirements of HAC RF for publishing scientific literature.
The reviewers of manuscripts are doctors of sciences and candidates of sciences, leading scientists and experts, which allow to select the best and perspective research for publication and corresponding to world standards.
Giving a review of the article, the reviewer confirms that, in his opinion, the article deserves (or deserves) publication. The review should contain all relevant and objective information, its volume is determined by the preferences of the reviewer in this area.
Review article submissions must reflect:
- are relevant to the magazine and relevance of the topic;
- analysis and justification of the problem;
- availability of scientific novelty, theoretical and practical significance of work;
- evaluation of the results of basic research;
- the use of legal acts, literature and other sources;
- quality of design work.
Information about the reviewer is confidential. Breach of confidentiality may only with the consent of the reviewer at the request of the author. By mutual desire of the author and the reviewer they can communicate without the help of the editorial board, if it is necessary to work on the manuscript, and there are no obstacles of a personal nature.
The editorial board after reviewing reserves the right to reject an article or return it for revision.
In the case the review includes objections to the content of the manuscript, the latter shall be returned to the authors with the request to refine the article in agreement with the objections of the reviewer or provide a substantiated written response to the reviewer.
In case of rejection of article revision to the authors reasoned refusal.
The Head Editor shall take the decision to refuse the publication of an article if the manuscript does not fit the remit of the Journal, the plagiarism has been detected or a negative review has been received. In some cases of negative review the article can be sent once again for reviewing to another specialist or a member of the Editorial Board and the possibility of its publication can be considered at the meeting of the Editorial Board.
Upon a positive review, the author is informed that the article has been accepted for publication.
From manuscripts received positive reviews is formed next issue of the magazine, which is approved by the Editorial Board and in working order.
The consideration of the manuscript and the decision on the publication or the return of the manuscript with a motivated refusal shall not exceed 1.5 month from the date of reception of the article by the editorial office.
Reviews are stored in the editorial staff of at least 5 years and when requested copies are sent to the Ministry of Education and Science of Russian Federation.